Been playing it for a couple of weeks. Average IMO. Nothing stands out to me as being great, and I still dislike games running in my web browser.
Welcome to PBBans
 |
Welcome to PBBans, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of PBBans by signing in or creating an account.
|
Guest Message by DevFuse
3
PunkBuster coming to Battlefield Heroes
Started by MaydaX, Jul 22 2008 09:30 AM
-
This topic is locked
49 replies to this topic
#41
-
- Members
-
-
Reputation: 8A step in the right direction
- 2,857 posts
Retired Staff
- Gender:Male
- Location:UK
- XFire:o1onightmare
Posted Mar 9, 2009 - 05:06 PM
#42
-
- Deactivated
-
-
Reputation: -18Has shameless behaviour
- 169 posts
Normal User
Posted Mar 20, 2009 - 10:02 AM
I got it & don't like it. it's like a really bad version of TF2.. Something you would find on the WII, kids might like it, But not for me.
#43
-
- Members
-
-
Reputation: 0None
- 18 posts
Normal User
- XFire:Flutisat
Posted Apr 25, 2009 - 04:52 PM
Currently, the beta servers are hosted by the usual game server hosts (game.co.uk, 4netplayers, and a couple of new server hosts). When the game is officially launched, the servers will have to be hosted individually, like all the other games in the BF series. You can currently pre-order a server and get 14 beta keys, which is how I got into the beta. You will need an EA account to create a soldier on Heroes, and for the banning part, there will be IP Bans, and if anyone tries to bypass the ban, he will receive a hardware ban, just like evenbalance did for warrock.
I hope that I have been of some help,
Oliver
I hope that I have been of some help,
Oliver
Edited by xX_Epidemic_Xx, Apr 25, 2009 - 04:54 PM.
#44
-
- Operations Staff
-
-
Reputation: 399Name is well known
- 8,178 posts
Mr. Sunshine
- Gender:Male
- Location:Georgia
- Steam:HSMagnet
- XFire:thehsmagnet
Posted Apr 25, 2009 - 05:31 PM
=BLACKWOLF=, on Mar 9th 2009, 05:06 PM, said:
Been playing it for a couple of weeks. Average IMO. Nothing stands out to me as being great, and I still dislike games running in my web browser.
average is being kind.
and i concur on the dislike for web browser games
it is done slightly better than
Quake Live as far as the screen. the little window in the broswer page of Quake Live is annoying
Edited by HSMagnet, Apr 25, 2009 - 05:34 PM.
#45
-
- Operations Staff
-
-
Reputation: 166Has a spectacular aura
- 4,853 posts
Accounts Jedi
- Gender:Male
- Location:Liverpool, UK
- Steam:the_duality
Posted Apr 25, 2009 - 05:46 PM
HSMagnet, on Apr 25th 2009, 11:31 PM, said:
average is being kind.
and i concur on the dislike for web browser games
it is done slightly better than
Quake Live as far as the screen. the little window in the broswer page of Quake Live is annoying
and i concur on the dislike for web browser games
it is done slightly better than
Quake Live as far as the screen. the little window in the broswer page of Quake Live is annoying
Play it in full screen - there is an option to do that once the game has started. Top left I think once you have joined a server, before you click "join game".
#46
-
- VIP
-
-
Reputation: 130Has a spectacular aura
- 2,673 posts
Abnormal User
- Gender:Male
Posted Apr 26, 2009 - 12:54 AM
Game is only windowed when your picking missions/changing settings/ among other things. Once your ingame it goes full screen.
Server's seem to crashing a helluva a lot.
Server's seem to crashing a helluva a lot.
#48
-
- Members
-
-
Reputation: 8A step in the right direction
- 2,857 posts
Retired Staff
- Gender:Male
- Location:UK
- XFire:o1onightmare
Posted Apr 26, 2009 - 05:17 AM
I still fail to see the point of it - what difference is there to Quake III, other than having to launch your web browser, navigate to the page, then play it.
Seems more of a fiddle to play than clicking a desktop icon. It's not like it's quicker to install or requires less downloads either.
Seems more of a fiddle to play than clicking a desktop icon. It's not like it's quicker to install or requires less downloads either.
#49
-
- Streaming Admin
-
-
Reputation: 12On a distinguished road
- 427 posts
Normal User
- Gender:Male
- Location:UK
- XFire:therealmcbain
Posted Apr 26, 2009 - 05:38 AM
=BLACKWOLF=, on Apr 26th 2009, 11:17 AM, said:
I still fail to see the point of it - what difference is there to Quake III, other than having to launch your web browser, navigate to the page, then play it.
Seems more of a fiddle to play than clicking a desktop icon. It's not like it's quicker to install or requires less downloads either.
Seems more of a fiddle to play than clicking a desktop icon. It's not like it's quicker to install or requires less downloads either.
I thought I was the only sceptic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
