Wouldn't it just be easier for everyone if MOH and BFBC2 were run like bf2 and 2142? Just release the server files already. It's not like players aren't taking advantage of the ranking system anyway.
Welcome to PBBans
![]() |
Welcome to PBBans, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of PBBans by signing in or creating an account.
|
Guest Message by DevFuse
Medal of Honor Support Suspended
Started by MaydaX, Nov 30 2010 07:14 PM
62 replies to this topic
#61
Posted Dec 16, 2010 - 10:43 PM
#62
Posted Dec 17, 2010 - 06:21 AM
No, it would not.
The game infrastructure is not zero-maintenance. The stability of BFBC2 is benefited by the command-and-control structure of the strictly-RSP program.
I will not go into further detail.
The game infrastructure is not zero-maintenance. The stability of BFBC2 is benefited by the command-and-control structure of the strictly-RSP program.
I will not go into further detail.
#63
Posted Aug 10, 2011 - 07:46 AM
so i managed a testserver, and the pbbans stream works, thx. nice job. saw the enforcebans also working. using ggc and pbbans now, but dice ... its not about the RSP i thought. is about that the player want FREE dedicated Serverfiles. look now in BF3 ...
http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/7473967.page
so gameservers.com told me, that is easy to release the serverfiles within the gamepackage, so we can manage streams more easier, and ++ find errors and so on. try coming back to the "root" lol.
http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/7473967.page
so gameservers.com told me, that is easy to release the serverfiles within the gamepackage, so we can manage streams more easier, and ++ find errors and so on. try coming back to the "root" lol.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












