Jump to content


Welcome to PBBans

Welcome to PBBans, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of PBBans by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Homefront 2


6 replies to this topic

#1 MaydaX

    Developer

  • Site Staff
  • Reputation: 1,150
    A reputation beyond repute
  • 8,803 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Regina SK, Canada
  • Origin:maydax
  • Steam:maydax
  • XFire:maydax

Posted Sep 20, 2011 - 07:37 AM

Quote

Homefront 2 will be developed by Crytek's UK studio, THQ has revealed.

The Nottingham-based developer worked on the multiplayer for Crysis 2 - previously, as independent studo Free Radical, it created cult shooter series Time Splitters and PS3-exclusive Haze.

Homefront, a military shooter set in a near future in which the US has been devastated and occupied by the 'Greater Korean Republic' was developed by Kaos Studios - despite Homefront becoming something of a hit for THQ, it closed Kaos earlier this year.

Crytek should be a good fit for the franchise though - it's own series Crysis is also set in the near future, has included the Korean military as an antagonist and featured a devastated New York in Crysis 2.

“We see Homefront as a really strong universe that has a lot of potential and that has been expertly created and marketed by THQ,” commented CXrytek boss Cevat Yerli. “We believe that bringing our level of quality, creativity and production values to the next Homefront title, creates an opportunity for both THQ and Crytek to deliver a truly blockbuster game. It’s really important to us that THQ has the faith in giving us a lot of creative freedom over one of its most important properties to allow us to bring the Homefront world to life in a new and innovative way.”

We'd expect Crytek to try and push the bar visually yet again with Homefront 2, with THQ's EVP of Core Games Danny Bilson hinting that the game will run on CryEngine 3.


http://www.nowgamer.com/news/1061699/crysis_2_studio_crytek_uk_making_homefront_2.html

#2 buttscratcher

    Normal User

  • Streaming Admin
  • Reputation: 158
    Has a spectacular aura
  • 910 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted Sep 20, 2011 - 08:58 AM

If at first you don't succeed, try try again?

#3 fozzer

    Accounts Manager

  • Site Staff
  • Reputation: 800
    Has a brilliant future
  • 25,097 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool U.K.

Posted Sep 20, 2011 - 08:59 AM

It's all very well saying this;

Quote

“We see Homefront as a really strong universe that has a lot of potential and that has been expertly created and marketed by THQ,” commented CXrytek boss Cevat Yerli. “We believe that bringing our level of quality, creativity and production values to the next Homefront title, creates an opportunity for both THQ and Crytek to deliver a truly blockbuster game. It’s really important to us that THQ has the faith in giving us a lot of creative freedom over one of its most important properties to allow us to bring the Homefront world to life in a new and innovative way.”

The interesting thing from my personal point of view will be seeing if THQ learned anything from rejecting the KAOS recomendation of PB as the anti cheat solution for HomeFront and electing to go with the VAC only option.
We are all aware of how that turned out :rolleyes:
Whats the old saying "you get what you pay for" and VAC was absolutely free :scratchchin:

The bar has been set by the TripWire game devs with RO2:HOS who give server admins the choice of PB or VAC, or PB + VAC with 3 different levels of PB to select from.

The track record of Crytek and THQ re anti cheat does not bode well.
Crytek never did get full PB intergration into any of their games and I well remember them promising a patch one day and then abandoning all support the next (Crysis)
PB support was dropped completely from both Crysis and Crysis Wars in Aug 2010 and their own attempt at anti cheat (Crysis2) has been a joke, I can not in all honesty find another way of describing it.
So in effect, Crytek have never experienced how effective PB + streaming can be because they have never managed to fully intergrate PB into any of their products.
THQ had time to intergrate PB into HomeFront and the KAOS devs were recommending that option, they chose to go with VAC only and the game never recovered from the huge influx of cheaters that plagued HomeFront from day 1 of retail release, causing HomeFront to crash and burn in a very short space of time.

Will THQ and Crytek learn anything from the past ?
I for one will be watching with interest to see what transpires :scratchchin:

#4 HSMagnet

    Mr. Sunshine

  • Operations Staff
  • Reputation: 399
    Name is well known
  • 8,180 posts

Posted Sep 20, 2011 - 12:19 PM

seems to me like throwing a couple of proven losers together and touting it as the formula for success....

#5 xX_Renegade_Xx

    Normal User

  • Members
  • Pip
  • Reputation: 20
    On a distinguished road
  • 407 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted Sep 20, 2011 - 03:32 PM

I thought the first game was a flop?

It must have exceeded sales expectations then, they sold 5 copies instead of 3! ;)

#6 wickysnip-NNB

    Normal User

  • Streaming Admin
  • Reputation: 5
    A step in the right direction
  • 284 posts

Posted Sep 20, 2011 - 04:32 PM

View PostxX_Renegade_Xx, on Sep 20, 2011 - 03:32 PM, said:

I thought the first game was a flop?

It must have exceeded sales expectations then, they sold 5 copies instead of 3! ;)

it die with in the first mouth of release

#7 SuperTaz

    Normal User

  • Operations Staff
  • Reputation: 536
    Has a brilliant future
  • 7,754 posts

Posted Sep 26, 2011 - 07:29 PM

http://www.crytek.com/news/thq-and-crytek-collaborate-to-develop-next-homefront-title

Spoiler








1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



DMCA.com