Jump to content


Welcome to PBBans

Welcome to PBBans, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of PBBans by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

About cfg


5 replies to this topic

#1 jabur

    Normal User

  • Members
  • Pip
  • Reputation: 0
    None
  • 3 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • XFire:mcjab

Posted Apr 12, 2009 - 09:11 AM

I want to talk about players who change their cfg...they reduce their recoil, remove grass and stark, and other stuff like that, i want to know if its possible to catch and ban this kind of player because its like a cheat.

Edited by jabur, Apr 12, 2009 - 09:11 AM.


#2 HSMagnet

    Mr. Sunshine

  • Operations Staff
  • Reputation: 399
    Name is well known
  • 8,177 posts

Posted Apr 12, 2009 - 09:34 AM

there are some cvar checks that you can set

r_lodscalerigid "4"//Level of detail for static objects (1=best to 4=worst) require 1 or 2
r_lodscaleskinned "4"//Level of detail for skinned objects (1=best to 4=worst) require 1 or 2
r_picmip "3"//Texture Quality (0=Extra to 3=Low) require 2 or lower

sample cvar checks

#3 fozzer

    Accounts Manager

  • Site Staff
  • Reputation: 800
    Has a brilliant future
  • 25,097 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool U.K.

Posted Apr 12, 2009 - 11:21 AM

View Postjabur, on Apr 12th 2009, 03:11 PM, said:

I want to talk about players who change their cfg...they reduce their recoil, remove grass and stark, and other stuff like that, i want to know if its possible to catch and ban this kind of player because its like a cheat.

Without getting into the old "when is tweaking considered cheating" debate :)
PBBans will never add anyone to the MBI without proof positive of cheat use by way of EvenBalance violation or PBBans scans.
The onus is on the server admins to create a level playing field for all by employing cvar restrictions as posted by HSMagnet.
The tools have been in place since day1 to combat tweakers, it just takes proactive admins to use them :P

#4 jimbouk1977

    Normal User

  • Members
  • Pip
  • Reputation: 9
    A step in the right direction
  • 700 posts

Posted Apr 16, 2009 - 10:27 PM

Fozzer do you mean admin that use PBBANS scripts or go out there way to find more checks ?? IF so point me that way also ;)

#5 EuT.be

    Normal User

  • Members
  • Pip
  • Reputation: 0
    None
  • 27 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vilvoorde, Belgium
  • XFire:eut

Posted May 1, 2009 - 05:59 AM

View PostHSMagnet, on Apr 12th 2009, 04:34 PM, said:

there are some cvar checks that you can set

r_lodscalerigid "4"//Level of detail for static objects (1=best to 4=worst) require 1 or 2
r_lodscaleskinned "4"//Level of detail for skinned objects (1=best to 4=worst) require 1 or 2
r_picmip "3"//Texture Quality (0=Extra to 3=Low) require 2 or lower

sample cvar checks
I dont get it why they're setting the picmip setting that strong hence you can easely set this via your options menu. What do they care actually if I want to playing with more squares on my screen if they dont want that?

I never tweaked my config and connected to a server and got kicked just that because I used the ingame options menu (which appearantly set picmip to 3) to lower several details in game to get just that little bit more fps and this w/o tweaking the game config.

#6 HSMagnet

    Mr. Sunshine

  • Operations Staff
  • Reputation: 399
    Name is well known
  • 8,177 posts

Posted May 1, 2009 - 07:36 AM

if you set them too low, even with the in game options menu, it can still trigger a violation

low graphic settings can provide an unfair advantage.

removing textures used for concealment and making outlines artificially easy to see





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



DMCA.com